Four officials from a CPL franchise pulled up by anti-corruption officers

8:50 AM ET

  • CloseSenior editor, ESPNcricinfo
      Osman spent the first half of his life pretending he discovered reverse swing with a tennis ball half-covered with electrical tape. The second half of his life was spent trying, and failing, to find spiritual fulfillment in the world of Pakistani advertising and marketing. The third half of his life will be devoted to convincing people that he did discover reverse swing. And occasionally writing about cricket. And learning mathematics.

Four officials from a CPL franchise were pulled up by anti-corruption officers during the 2019 season. One of them, thought to be either part of or close to the ownership structure, was the main focus of a report made to anti-corruption officials by a player from the franchise. The man was detained at Trinidad airport, not allowed to travel with the team during the early part of the season and ultimately was asked to leave the tournament.

The individual in question did not make a direct approach to the player who eventually reported him. Instead, ESPNcricinfo understands, the nature of the interactions between them had made the player wary. Sources say that the player believed he was being groomed as someone who could eventually be approached to carry out corrupt activities, which is what led him to reporting him to the anti-corruption authorities,

It is unclear how influential or senior the individual in question is, or whether he has a stake in the ownership of the franchise, but he did present himself to the player as part of the ownership group.

There are believed to have been several interactions, in the casino of the hotel where the team was staying, that prompted the player to go to the anti-corruption officer. There are said to be a few one-on-one meetings the player was asked to attend with this individual, by which stage the player was so uncomfortable and suspicious he had taken to recording the meetings surreptitiously on his phone.

No direct offer was made, though in one of the one-on-one meetings, talk had begun to turn to performances in an upcoming game.

“Any such incident which is reported to the CPL [officials] is taken very seriously and investigated thoroughly,” a CPL spokesperson said. “Our policy is that we do not comment on anti-corruption related matters or incidents. We are firmly committed to making sure the tournament’s integrity is protected. We are very confident that our anti-corruption team, in conjunction with the ICC colleagues, make sure this remains the case.”

Incidentally, the ICC ACU, which had been providing anti-corruption cover every year from the first season of the CPL, was not appointed this time around.

When the ICC’s ACU was employed, it is believed between four to six officers manned the tournament. ESPNcricinfo understands that for the 2019 season, the CPL appointed an independent person, who had previously worked as a part-time consultant for the ICC’s ACU. It is believed that the measure was a step to cut down on costs.

“There was an anti-corruption officer for both legs of the tournament with players given a briefing at the start of the event to reconfirm the process needed if an approach is made,” a CPL spokesperson said.

It is believed the ICC has asked for a detailed report from the CPL officials. The ICC has been concerned about ownership structures at a number of domestic T20 leagues in various countries. Usually the organisers vet the owners through their respective anti-corruption units, or the ICC ACU, from an integrity point of view.

Article source:


Best Wordpress Plugin development company in India     Best Web development company in India

Related posts

Mickey Arthur set to become Sri Lanka head coach

Times of News

Chris Nash, Samit Patel edge Nottinghamshire towards solid response

Times of News

Didn’t expect so much turn on first day

Times of News