(Reuters) – A U.S. jury on Tuesday returned a $315 million outcome opposite Scientific Games Corp (SGMS.O), observant a gambling products association had instituted a whimsical obvious lawsuit in hopes of determining a marketplace for involuntary card-shufflers during casinos.
The Chicago jury awarded $105 million to a organisation of companies led by Shuffle Tech International LLC that contest with Scientific Games in a marketplace for gaming equipment. The indemnification were automatically tripled underneath U.S. antitrust law.
“The association believes a jury reached a wrong outcome and will find examination of both a anticipating of guilt and a indemnification endowment both before a hearing justice and if required on appeal,” pronounced Scientific Games mouthpiece Susan Cartwright in a statement.
Las Vegas-based Scientific Games provides record and services to government-run lotteries and casinos.
Shuffle Tech and dual other companies, Aces Up Gaming Inc and Poydras-Talrick Holdings LLC, collaborated in 2012 on an involuntary label shuffler dictated to contest with Scientific Games’ products.
Scientific Games filed a lawsuit in 2012 alleging that Shuffle Tech was regulating a law record but authorization.
Shuffle Tech, Aces Up, and Poydras-Talrick responded with an antitrust lawsuit in 2015, claiming Scientific Games performed overly broad, shabby patents by dubious a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and intent in “sham obvious lawsuit opposite any aspirant that dared to marketplace rival label shufflers.”
A jury hearing in a antitrust box began on Jul 16.
Scientific Games had argued in justice filings that it did not intend to trick a obvious bureau and that a lawsuit opposite Shuffle Tech was not frivolous.
Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Richard Chang
Article source: http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/INbusinessNews/~3/IGb_XYt3FgU/u-s-jury-orders-scientific-games-to-pay-315-million-in-antitrust-case-idINKBN1KS2IR